POLYARTICULAR JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS - PREVENTION OF CHRONIC JOINT DAMAGE

Authors

  • Dragana Lazarević Clinic for Children's Internal Diseases, Clinical Center Niš, Niš, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46793/PP170204005L

Keywords:

juvenile idiopathic arthritis, polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, treatment

Abstract

Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) is defined as arthritis affecting more than 5 joints in the first six months of the disease. According to the rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity we recognize RF positive JIA and RF negative JIA. Clinical presentation of these subtypes is similar, but they differ in clinical course and outcome. RF positive pJIA patients tend to have worse outcome than RF negative pJIA patients with early appearance of joint damage, why more aggressive treatment approach is needed. JIA etiopathogenesis novelties and genetic engineering improvement provided new treatment strategies which have resulted in better disease course and clinical outcome. The main goal of this new therapeutical approach is to ensure good quality of life, to reduce disease activity,  to optimize children growth, preserve joint functional activity, prevent joint damage, as well as physical and working disability. Individualized treatment approach depends on pJIA subtype and presence of poor prognostic factors. It represents combination of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drugs followed with continuous occupational treatment. pJIA patients require earlier and more aggressive treatment with metotrexate and biological treatment commencement, especially if there is not adequate response on metotrexate treatment. One decade positive experience with biological treatment at our department had shown therapy efficacy and safety in the youngest population, which is in concordance with finding among other European contries.

References

Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, et al. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004; 31(2):390-2.

Fink CW. Proposal for the development of classification criteria for idiopathic arthritides of childhood. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(8):1566-9.

Beukelman T, Patkar NM, Saag KG, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Cron RQ, DeWitt EM, et al. 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(4):465-82.

La Torre F, Cattalini M, Teruzzi B, Meini A, Moramarco F, Iannone F. Efficacy of adalimumab in young children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and chronic uveitis: a case series. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:316.

Petty RE, Southwood TR, Baum J, Bhettay E, Glass DN, Manners P, et al. Revision of the proposed classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Durban, 1997. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(10):1991-4..

Oberle EJ, Harris JG, Verbsky JW. Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis - epidemiology and management approaches. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:379-93.

van Rossum M, van Soesbergen R, de Kort S, ten Cate R, Zwinderman AH, de Jong B, et al. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(4):825-8.

Guzman J, Oen K, Tucker LB, Huber AM, Shiff N, Boire G, et al. The outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children managed with contemporary treatments: results from the ReACCh-Out cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(10):1854-60.

Hyrich KL, Lal SD, Foster HE, Thornton J, Adib N, Baildam E, et al. Disease activity and disability in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis one year following presentation to paediatric rheumatology. Results from the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2010;49(1):116-22.

Fantini F, Gerloni V, Gattinara M, Cimaz R, Arnoldi C, Lupi E. Remission in juvenile chronic arthritis: a cohort study of 683 consecutive cases with a mean 10 year followup. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(3):579-84.

Wallace CA, Ruperto N, Giannini E. Preliminary criteria for clinical remission for select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(11):2290-4.

Packham JC, Hall MA. Long-term follow-up of 246 adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: functional outcome. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2002;41(12):1428-35.

Webb K, Wedderburn LR. Advances in the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015;27(5):505-10.

Brunner HI, Ruperto N, Zuber Z, Keane C, Harari O, Kenwright A, et al. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind withdrawal trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6):1110-7.

Ringold S, Weiss PF, Colbert RA, DeWitt EM, Lee T, Onel K, et al. Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance consensus treatment plans for new-onset polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(7):1063-72.

Wulffraat NM, Vastert B. Time to share. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2013 ;15;11(1):5.

Horneff G, De Bock F, Foeldvari I, Girschick HJ, Michels H, Moebius D, et al. Safety and efficacy of combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared to treatment with etanercept only in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): preliminary data from the German JIA Registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(4):519-25.

Prince FH, Twilt M, ten Cate R, van Rossum MA, Armbrust W, Hoppenreijs EP, et al. Long-term follow-up on effectiveness and safety of etanercept in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the Dutch national register. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(5):635-41.

Horneff G, Minden K, Foeldvari I, Onken N, Windschall D, Hospach A, et al. [Current news from the BIKER register]. Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie. 2014;73(10):897-906.

Downloads

Published

04/28/2018

Issue

Section

Review Articles